🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step constitutes a direct response by the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as theft. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU corporate holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key role in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to repay the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our public funds, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also delivers a powerful message that when you cause all this destruction to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."